Deliberation modeLive
Debate
Two agents argue for the resolution, two argue against it, and a neutral judge scores the result across evidence, practicality, risk, fairness and reversibility. Six rounds, ending in a verdict with a confidence figure and the evidence that would change it.
Round sequence
Every turn records the claims and sources it rests on.Six rounds, then a verdict
01
Opening
Each side states its case from its own evidence, without having seen the other's.
02
Cross-examination
Each side puts the question its opponent has to answer to keep its case standing.
03
Rebuttal
Direct replies. Concessions here are what the judge weighs most heavily.
04
Closing
Each side states what it thinks survived, and on what condition.
05
Judge review
The neutral model reads the transcript and marks what was actually settled.
06
Synthesis
The verdict, its confidence, and the evidence that would overturn it.
The lineup
P1
Opening case
model varies by round
P2
Implementation rebuttal
model varies by round
C1
Risk case
model varies by round
C2
Stakeholder rebuttal
model varies by round
J
Neutral judge
judge model
Duo
One agent a side
The duo size runs a single pro agent against a single con agent, with the same judge and the same six rounds. Each speaks in every round, which makes the transcript easier to follow. Pick it on the composer before starting a run.
In duo, the pro side, con side and judge each have a model choice. In quartet, model choices are per round type. The telemetry tab shows what each call cost.