Deliberation modeLive
Hybrid Council
Two agents argue for the resolution, two argue against it, and a neutral judge scores the result across evidence, practicality, risk, fairness and reversibility. Six rounds, ending in a verdict with a confidence figure and the evidence that would change it.
Round sequence
Every turn records the claims and sources it rests on.Six rounds, then a verdict
01
Opening
Each side states its case from its own evidence, without having seen the other's.
02
Cross-examination
Each side puts the question its opponent has to answer to keep its case standing.
03
Rebuttal
Direct replies. Concessions here are what the judge weighs most heavily.
04
Closing
Each side states what it thinks survived, and on what condition.
05
Judge review
The neutral model reads the transcript and marks what was actually settled.
06
Synthesis
The verdict, its confidence, and the evidence that would overturn it.
The lineup
P1
Opening case
quick slot
P2
Implementation rebuttal
quick slot
C1
Risk case
deep slot
C2
Stakeholder rebuttal
deep slot
J
Neutral judge
judge slot
Duo
One agent a side
The duo size runs a single pro agent against a single con agent, with the same judge and the same six rounds. Each speaks in every round, which makes the transcript easier to follow. Pick it on the composer before starting a run.
Model routing is per slot, so the pro side, the con side and the judge can each run a different model — and the telemetry tab shows what each one cost.